← All candidates
One insider buy in the last year — $99.7K in all.
34 filings on record.
SANMSANMINA CORP
NasdaqGS · Technology · $10.49B
$195.75
+2.16% · Sep 16
One insider buy in the last year — $99.7K in all.
Nothing in the last fortnight.
Price · 1Y · daily● 1 buy● 10 sells◆ 2 8-K
▸ hover a marker for the filing · drag to zoom · 4 moves explained
Reverse-split 1×. When a company does a reverse split, the chart rewrites its old prices to look far bigger than they really were — so the high early prices here aren't what SANM ever actually traded at. The drop is real, but those huge old numbers aren't.
AI brief · from the filings on this pagePro
The filings, the score and the setup on this page, read for you in about ten seconds — what the insiders did, and what stands against it.
Market cap
$10.49B
Float
51.9M
97% public
Short % float
Pro
Price / profit
34.3
Price / future profit
14.1
Price / sales
0.8
The buyers
▸ each insider's past open-market buys, measured ~6 months (120 trading days) later, against the S&P over the same spans · split-adjusted · pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan trades excluded · past outcomes, not predictions
Director
Loparco Michael J
Bought $99.7K on Jan 30 — 700 sh @ $142.46, held direct, 22% of their stake.
1 of 1 position beat the S&P
Institutional stakes
▸ a holder crossing 5% files Schedule 13D if they intend to act on the company, 13G if they certify they will not · /A amends an earlier filing
1 filingnewest first
The record
newest first
DateTypeInsiderOf stakeShares @ priceValue
29 more transactions on Pro →Context
Coverage
Sanmina (SANM) Is Up 8.8% After Whistleblower Case Settlement Lifts Legacy Legal OverhangSimply Wall St. · 2d agoSanmina's Cash Flow Gains Momentum: Can the Trend Continue?Zacks · 1w agoSanmina vs. Silicon Motion: Which AI Stock Has More Upside Now?Zacks · 1w agoShould You Bet on SANM Stock Amid Rising Earnings Estimate Revisions?Zacks · 2w ago
The file stays open
34 filings on record.
The next one will be too.
▸ SEC EDGAR · FINRA · Nasdaq — public sources only · research, not advice